New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reduce with user-defined sub fail #1042
Comments
From daniel@ruoso.com<ruoso> rakudo: multi a (Str $a, Str $b) { [+$a, +$b] }; multi a (Array daniel |
From @pmichaudOn Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 08:01:50AM -0700, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
At present C<reduce> doesn't work well with multisubs, as it's It may be that we want reduce to simply assume arity 2. Pm |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From daniel@ruoso.comEm Dom, 2009-06-14 às 10:09 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud escreveu:
This is a different problem indeed. We still don't know what to do in
I'm not sure that is a sane option... Since we have the ... operator daniel |
From @bbkrOn Kiev build $ perl6 -e 'multi a (Str $a, Str $b) { [+$a, +$b] }; multi a (Array $a, |
From @cokeToday: $ ./perl6 -e 'multi a (Str $a, Str $b) { [+$a, +$b] }; multi a (Array -- |
From @diakopterOn Fri Sep 30 17:44:43 2011, coke wrote:
new behavior: 17:27 <diakopter> r: multi a (Str $a, Str $b) { [+$a, +$b] }; multi a |
From @moritzThe newest behavior is correct, and now tested in S32-list/reduce.t. |
@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#66352 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT66352$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: