New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
&[==] and other similar short forms #990
Comments
From @masak<moritz_> rakudo: &[==] |
From @colomoncolomon: rakudo: say sort(&[<=>], <1 10 2 3>).perl This should work according to -- |
From @kylehaThis is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in t/spec/S03-operators/nesting.t commit 1e56508ad5008b7c0d0426c54d7d7028c560b7ae [t/spec] Tests for RT #68008 Inline Patchdiff --git a/t/spec/S03-operators/nesting.t b/t/spec/S03-operators/nesting.t
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..07cf87c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/spec/S03-operators/nesting.t
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+use v6;
+use Test;
+
+plan 2;
+
+# L<S03/Meta operators/Nesting of metaoperators/Any infix function may be referred to as a noun either by the normal long form or a short form>
+
+#?rakudo 2 skip 'RT #68008'
+ok &infix:<+> === &[+], 'long and short form are the same';
+is sort( &[<=>], <5 3 2 1 4> ), <1 2 3 4 5>, 'sort works using &[<=>]'; |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @jnthnOn Wed Jul 29 05:56:22 2009, colomon@gmail.com wrote:
Oh awesome I fixed it.
Given to moritz++ for spectests. Thanks, Jonathan |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @moritzTested in S03-operators/nesting.t |
@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#65588 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT65588$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: