We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrated from rt.perl.org#64606 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT64606$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
<masak> rakudo: say (1,2,3).map: { $_ } <p6eval> rakudo 486694: OUTPUT«123» <masak> rakudo: module Foo { say (1,2,3).map: { $_ } } <p6eval> rakudo 486694: OUTPUT«Parameter type check failed for expr in call to map [...] * masak submits rakudobug
I'd expect the parameter type check to the map to pass or fail in the same way, regardless of whether the map is in a module or not.
Sorry, something went wrong.
On Thu Apr 09 08:50:57 2009, masak wrote:
<masak> rakudo: say (1,2,3).map: { $_ } <p6eval> rakudo 486694: OUTPUT«123» <masak> rakudo: module Foo { say (1,2,3).map: { $_ } } <p6eval> rakudo 486694: OUTPUT«Parameter type check failed for expr in call to map [...] * masak submits rakudobug I'd expect the parameter type check to the map to pass or fail in the same way, regardless of whether the map is in a module or not.
Test added to t/spec/S10-packages/basic.t
Cheers, Moritz
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'
No branches or pull requests
Migrated from rt.perl.org#64606 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT64606$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: