From @masak

<masak> rakudo​: say (1..8)[*-1]
<jnthn> Well, I guess we can hand back Inf.
<p6eval> rakudo 0310a3​: OUTPUT«elements() not implemented in class 'Range' [...]
* masak submits rakudobug
<pmichaud> Range doesn't understand Positional yet.
<jnthn> Ah, yes, I guess Range will want its own implementation of Positional.

From @jnthn

On Sun Apr 05 08​:58​:34 2009, masak wrote​:

<masak> rakudo​: say (1..8)[*-1]
<p6eval> rakudo 0310a3​: OUTPUT«elements() not implemented in class
'Range' [...]
* masak submits rakudobug
<pmichaud> Range doesn't understand Positional yet.

They understand it sufficiently now to get at least this and slices of
ranges right. Doesn't do laziness, but think that's a separate ticket or
for when we more generally deal with laziness.

Added a couple of tests, including the example in the ticket.

Thanks,

Jonathan

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'