Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rakudo thinks that protoobjects are defined #665

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Jan 29, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

Rakudo thinks that protoobjects are defined #665

p6rt opened this issue Jan 29, 2009 · 4 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Jan 29, 2009

Migrated from rt.perl.org#62894 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT62894$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jan 29, 2009

From @masak

<masak> so protoobjects are defined?
<masak> rakudo​: class A {}; my A $a; say $a.defined
<p6eval> rakudo 36139​: OUTPUT«1␤»
<moritz_> well, that's wrong
* masak submits rakudobug
<moritz_> perl6​: my $a; say $a.defined
<p6eval> rakudo 36139​: OUTPUT«0␤»
<p6eval> ..elf 25110, pugs​: OUTPUT«␤»
<moritz_> perl6​: class A { }; my A $a; say $a.defined
<p6eval> rakudo 36139​: OUTPUT«1␤»
<p6eval> ..elf 25110, pugs​: OUTPUT«␤»
<masak> hah, two against one :)

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Feb 11, 2009

From @jnthn

On Thu Jan 29 02​:18​:55 2009, masak wrote​:

<masak> so protoobjects are defined?
<masak> rakudo​: class A {}; my A $a; say $a.defined
<p6eval> rakudo 36139​: OUTPUT«1␤»
<moritz_> well, that's wrong
* masak submits rakudobug
<moritz_> perl6​: my $a; say $a.defined
<p6eval> rakudo 36139​: OUTPUT«0␤»
<p6eval> ..elf 25110, pugs​: OUTPUT«␤»
<moritz_> perl6​: class A { }; my A $a; say $a.defined
<p6eval> rakudo 36139​: OUTPUT«1␤»
<p6eval> ..elf 25110, pugs​: OUTPUT«␤»
<masak> hah, two against one :)

Fixed in git d668ca9 and tests added to S12-class/basic.t to make sure
we don't regress on it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Feb 11, 2009

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Feb 11, 2009

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Feb 11, 2009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant