New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Internal Parrot errors leak through when passing some kinds of pairs #650
Comments
From @masakRakudo r35994: $ perl6 -e 'Hash.new( a => "b" )' $ perl6 -e 'sub foo(*%h) { say %h.perl }; foo( :a(1) )' The two exception messages come from lines 556 and 567, respectively, |
From @jnthnOn Sun Jan 25 04:44:47 2009, masak wrote:
I figured this would be easy to fix, but it's not. Basically, because Any input from the Parrot side would be good on if we can change Jonathan |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @chromaticOn Wednesday 28 January 2009 05:43:08 jnthn@jnthn.net via RT wrote:
Can you show some example PIR code that should work? -- c |
From @jnthnchromatic wrote:
Ah, yes, sorry... .sub 'main' .sub 'example' Uncomment the line I commented out, and IMCC gives a syntax error. Thanks! Jonathan |
From @WhiteknightOn Thu Jan 29 02:16:23 2009, jonathan@jnthn.net wrote:
IMCC currently allows this "name"=>value syntax in three places: in a .return("name"=>value) I assume that we want to be able to use SREGs (and string variables) in -- |
From @chromaticOn Thursday 29 January 2009 02:14:23 Jonathan Worthington wrote:
I can't reproduce that error as of r36159. (That's because I fixed it in r36159.) -- c |
From @moritzOn Sun Jan 25 04:44:47 2009, masak wrote:
Works now, and tested in t/spec/S02-builtin_data_types/hash.t. |
@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'stalled' |
From @bacekIt's actually resolved not stalled. -- |
@bacek - Status changed from 'stalled' to 'resolved' |
@masak - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open' |
From @masakNo, it's actually open, not resolved. The original bug description also consisted of this Parrot leakage: $ perl6 -e 'sub foo(*%h) { say %h.perl }; foo( :a(1) )' As of Rakudo 924ec3f, the above still fails. |
From @moritzOn Sat Apr 04 02:58:31 2009, masak wrote:
Works now (Rakudo 7b56f00fbbd3ac7cab98c20429051e7cfd2785ca), and tested Anybody who protests any further will be shot ;-) Cheers, |
@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#62730 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT62730$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: