Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(*-1) should construct a Code object #592

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Jan 8, 2009 · 7 comments
Closed

(*-1) should construct a Code object #592

p6rt opened this issue Jan 8, 2009 · 7 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Jan 8, 2009

Migrated from rt.perl.org#62066 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT62066$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jan 8, 2009

From @masak

<moritz_> perl6​: say (*-1).WHAT
<p6eval> ..rakudo 35195​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_number() [...]
* masak reports rakudobug

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jan 11, 2009

From @pmichaud

On Thu Jan 08 02​:13​:32 2009, masak wrote​:

<moritz_> perl6​: say (*-1).WHAT
<p6eval> ..rakudo 35195​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_number() [...]
* masak reports rakudobug

Now "fixed" in r35420, although I'm not sure what the numeric value
should end up being.

Assigning ticket to moritz for spectest update.

Pm

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jan 11, 2009

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jan 11, 2009

From @moritz

On Sun Jan 11 08​:34​:30 2009, pmichaud wrote​:

On Thu Jan 08 02​:13​:32 2009, masak wrote​:

<moritz_> perl6​: say (*-1).WHAT
<p6eval> ..rakudo 35195​: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_number() [...]
* masak reports rakudobug

Now "fixed" in r35420, although I'm not sure what the numeric value
should end up being.

Assigning ticket to moritz for spectest update.

I wrote t/spec/S02-builtin_data_types/whatever.t, and added it to
t/spectest.data

(*-1).WHAT should return Code, and *-1 should be the closure { $_ - 1 }.

I leave this ticket open to remind everybody that this needs to be
implemented.

Cheers,
Moritz

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Jun 30, 2009

From @kyleha

On Sun Jan 11 11​:39​:10 2009, moritz wrote​:

I leave this ticket open to remind everybody that this needs to be
implemented.

The test for this is passing now. Can this ticket be closed?

Kyle.

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 19, 2009

From @jnthn

On Mon Jun 29 21​:04​:59 2009, KyleHa wrote​:

On Sun Jan 11 11​:39​:10 2009, moritz wrote​:

I leave this ticket open to remind everybody that this needs to be
implemented.

The test for this is passing now. Can this ticket be closed?

Indeed it can. Closing.

Thanks,

Jonathan

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Aug 19, 2009

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

@p6rt p6rt closed this as completed Aug 19, 2009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant