From @moritz

Rakudo as of r33193 doesn't implement lexical subroutines; neither 'my
sub ...' is implemented nor does 'my $x = sub { ... }' work properly (a
test for the latter can be found in t/spec/integration/man-or-boy.t).

Moritz

From @jnthn

On Tue Nov 25 13​:19​:15 2008, moritz wrote​:

Rakudo as of r33193 doesn't implement lexical subroutines; neither 'my
sub ...' is implemented nor does 'my $x = sub { ... }' work properly (a
test for the latter can be found in t/spec/integration/man-or-boy.t).

All of​:

my $x = sub { ... }
my &x = sub { ... }
sub foo(&x) { x() }

Now work. Lexical subroutines are still todo.

Jonathan

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @moritz

On Wed Nov 26 11​:54​:02 2008, jnthn@​jnthn.net wrote​:

On Tue Nov 25 13​:19​:15 2008, moritz wrote​:

Rakudo as of r33193 doesn't implement lexical subroutines; neither 'my
sub ...' is implemented nor does 'my $x = sub { ... }' work properly (a
test for the latter can be found in t/spec/integration/man-or-boy.t).

That test depends on RT #​61982, but the lexical aspects surely work.

Lexical subroutines are still todo.

Status update​: 'my sub name { ... }' is parsed, but it's not lexical​:

$ ./perl6 -e '{ my sub f { say "in f" }; f() }; f(); { my sub f { say
"in second f" }; f() }; f()'
in f
in f
in f
in f

That should die on the second call to f().

Cheers,
Moritz

From @jnthn

On Tue Jan 20 11​:29​:48 2009, moritz wrote​:

Status update​: 'my sub name { ... }' is parsed, but it's not lexical​:

$ ./perl6 -e '{ my sub f { say "in f" }; f() }; f(); { my sub f { say
"in second f" }; f() }; f()'
in f
in f
in f
in f

That should die on the second call to f().

And as of git c40f3b9 it does so. Plus unfudged a couple of tests,
though there may well be others depending on lexical subs we can now
unfudge too.

Thanks,

Jonathan

@jnthn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'