New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Followup: script fails for perl versions newer than 5.005_02 #1835
Comments
From friebel@ifh.deCreated by wolfgang.friebel@desy.deHi, the mail on the same subject yesterday did not contain a correct email address In the script # Author: F Schrempp I studied the bug a little furter: Obviously the heuristics for recognizing Wolfgang Friebel Perl Info
|
From @schwernI confirm this bug in 5.5.4, 5.6.2, 5.8.6 and bleadperl. |
From nobull@cpan.orgThis should be merged with 3090 and the subject of both changed to The if(EXPR){BLOCK} construct instanciates a new scope on each iteration A failed regex does not update the last match context. Considering these facts the observed behavoiur of the illustrative The same behaviour can be seen more simply with a more "ordinary" match Arguably if we get rid of the if(){} we do see a bug because a match use strict; print "With if () {}\n"; print "Without if () {}\n"; |
From nobull@cpan.orgThis is also the same issue as is raised in 1833 so a "depends on" link |
From @HugmeirOn Sun Aug 19 13:29:04 2007, nobull@cpan.org wrote:
Since https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl5/Ticket/Display.html?id=3090 is a duplicate |
@cpansprout - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#3098 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT3098$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: