From thospel@mail.dma.be

In article <27422.954388987@​chthon>,
  Tom Christiansen <tchrist@​chthon.perl.com> writes​:

Consider​:
- a setuid script without -T
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think you're forgetting something.

You mean that the documentation says that setuid implies taint ?

Yes, I realise that. But when I tested, I saw that . remained in my @​INC.
But now when trying to prove this I can't, and going back in my history
I see that I did

chown 4755 test.pl

instead of

chmod 4755 test.pl

So I screwed up, and the report is nonsense.

Sorry :-(

From The RT System itself

'to quote the submitter \'So I screwed up, and the report is nonsense. \'\n'