Bug #2181 for perl5: OK: perl v5.5.660 on sun4-solaris 2.8.1

# Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:31:20 -0800 Alan Burlison <rootal@arioch.uk.sun.com> - Ticket created [Reply] [Comment]

Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:31:07 GMT
From:	Alan Burlison <rootal [...] arioch.uk.sun.com>
To:	perlbug [...] perl.com
Subject:	OK: perl v5.5.660 on sun4-solaris 2.8.1

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 2.4k

This is a success report for perl from root@arioch, generated with the help of perlbug 1.27 running under perl v5.5.660. Perl reported to build OK on this system. --- Site configuration information for perl v5.5.660: Configured by rootal at Tue Feb 22 13:20:57 GMT 2000. Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 5 subversion 660) configuration: Platform: osname=solaris, osvers=2.8.1, archname=sun4-solaris uname='sunos arioch 5.8.1 s81_05 sun4u sparc sunw,ultra-enterprise ' config_args='-dsOE -Dprefix=/home1/rootal/perl/devel -Doptimize=-xO2 -Uusemymalloc -Duseshrplib -Duse64bits -Dlibpth=/usr/lib/sparcv9 -Dccflags=-xarch=v9a -Dlddlflags=-G -xarch=v9a -Dldflags=-xarch=v9a' hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define usethreads=undef use5005threads=undef useithreads=undef usesocks=undef useperlio=undef d_sfio=undef use64bits=define uselargefiles=define usemultiplicity=undef Compiler: cc='cc', optimize='-xO2', gccversion= cppflags='-xarch=v9a' ccflags ='-xarch=v9a -DUSE_64_BITS -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64' stdchar='char', d_stdstdio=undef, usevfork=false intsize=4, longsize=8, ptrsize=8, doublesize=8 d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=16 ivtype='long', ivsize=8, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8 alignbytes=8, usemymalloc=n, prototype=define Linker and Libraries: ld='cc', ldflags ='-xarch=v9a ' libpth=/usr/lib/sparcv9 libs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lm -lc -lsec libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so Dynamic Linking: dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags=' -R /home1/rootal/perl/devel/lib/5.5.660/sun4-solaris/CORE' cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -xarch=v9a' Locally applied patches: --- @INC for perl v5.5.660: /home1/rootal/perl/devel/lib/5.5.660/sun4-solaris /home1/rootal/perl/devel/lib/5.5.660 /home1/rootal/perl/devel/lib/site_perl/5.5.660/sun4-solaris /home1/rootal/perl/devel/lib/site_perl/5.5.660 /home1/rootal/perl/devel/lib/site_perl . --- Environment for perl v5.5.660: HOME=/home1/rootal LANG (unset) LANGUAGE (unset) LD_LIBRARY_PATH (unset) LOGDIR (unset) PATH=/home1/rootal/perl/devel/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/perl5/bin:/opt/gcc/bin:/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/home1/rootal/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/ucb:. PERL_BADLANG (unset) SHELL=/bin/ksh

# Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:59:07 -0800 The RT System itself - Correspondence added [Reply] [Comment]

To:	perl5-porters [...] perl.org
Subject:	Re: [ID 20000222.002] OK: perl v5.5.660 on sun4-solaris 2.8.1
From:	"M.J.T. Guy" <mjtg [...] cus.cam.ac.uk>
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:58:58 +0000

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 328b

Alan Burlison <rootal@arioch.uk.sun.com> wrote [ success report ] A recent message suggested that OK reports were meant to be filtered out, and not sent to p5p? Has this policy changed? Or do the recent rash of reports indicate a bug? What is the algorithm used to decide whether a message is an "OK" ? Mike Guy

# Tue, 22 Feb 2000 23:53:10 -0800 The RT System itself - Correspondence added [Reply] [Comment]

To:	perl5-porters [...] perl.org
Subject:	Re: [ID 20000222.002] OK: perl v5.5.660 on sun4-solaris 2.8.1
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:57:47 +0000
From:	Hugo <hv [...] crypt.compulink.co.uk>

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 457b

In <E12NdFi-0000hz-00@ursa.cus.cam.ac.uk>, "M.J.T. Guy" writes: :Alan Burlison <rootal@arioch.uk.sun.com> wrote : [ success report ] : :A recent message suggested that OK reports were meant to be filtered :out, and not sent to p5p? Has this policy changed? Or do the :recent rash of reports indicate a bug? : :What is the algorithm used to decide whether a message is an "OK" ? I suspect that the new style version numbers have broken it. Hugo

# Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:40:40 -0800 The RT System itself - Correspondence added [Reply] [Comment]

To:	"M.J.T. Guy" <mjtg [...] cus.cam.ac.uk>
Cc:	perl5-porters [...] perl.org
Subject:	Re: [ID 20000222.002] OK: perl v5.5.660 on sun4-solaris 2.8.1
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:42:46 -0800
From:	Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar [...] ActiveState.com>

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 529b

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:58:58 GMT, "M.J.T. Guy" wrote: Show quoted text

>Alan Burlison <rootal@arioch.uk.sun.com> wrote > [ success report ] > >A recent message suggested that OK reports were meant to be filtered >out, and not sent to p5p? Has this policy changed?

It has, as a special-case for the 5.6 release and/or until we set up a separate mailing list to send these messages to. They were disappearing into the perlbug database where things like Greg's build database had no easy way to get at them. Sarathy gsar@ActiveState.com