New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
.gist of a Map was arguably better in the past (say Map.new(‘a’ => ‘b’)) #6603
Comments
From @AlexDanielCode: ¦«2015.12»: ¦«2016.06»: ¦«2016.12»: ¦«2017.06»: ¦«HEAD»: Possible IRC discussion: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-10-09#i_15275925 Bisectable: (2017-10-07) rakudo/rakudo@9247045 I think the previous output was better because (accidentally or not) it was giving executable code. Not that it has to be executable, but :a("b") makes a bit more sense than a => b for those who are familiar with perl 6. Maybe not, feel free to argue otherwise, I'm just the messenger. |
From @zoffixznetOn Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:59:36 -0700, alex.jakimenko@gmail.com wrote:
This was done on purpose. `Map.gist` used to call `.perl` on the pairs in the past instead of `.gist`, which both is different from what `Hash.gist` does and is not correct. Certain things cannot be .perled while they can be gisted and also for some things (like List and Blob) .perl gives All The Things� for some things while .gist gives just the gist. c: 2017.07,HEAD Map.new((:42a, b => (1...2000))).gist.say c: 2017.07,HEAD Map.new((:42a, b => (1...*))).gist.say |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#132284 (status was 'rejected')
Searchable as RT132284$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: