We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrated from rt.perl.org#130369 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT130369$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Code: say 2**-999999
Result (2015.12 .. 2016.11): Numeric overflow in block <unit> at /tmp/GYbmLKwQ4g line 1
Actually thrown at: in block <unit> at /tmp/GYbmLKwQ4g line 1
Result (HEAD): 0
I am not sure what is the best solution here, but I guess having an exception if the value is being zeroed is a good idea.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ah, forgot to mention that bisectable points to rakudo/rakudo@cf05254
On 2016-12-18 03:45:44, alex.jakimenko@gmail.com wrote:
Code: say 2**-999999 Result (2015.12 .. 2016.11): Numeric overflow in block <unit> at /tmp/GYbmLKwQ4g line 1 Actually thrown at: in block <unit> at /tmp/GYbmLKwQ4g line 1 Result (HEAD): 0 I am not sure what is the best solution here, but I guess having an exception if the value is being zeroed is a good idea.
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 03:45:44 -0800, alex.jakimenko@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the report. This is now fixed.
Fix: rakudo/rakudo@7a642f865a Test: Raku/roast@522a9c7857
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'
No branches or pull requests
Migrated from rt.perl.org#130369 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT130369$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: