New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pair in enum declaration should either DWIM or parsefail #5785
Comments
From @FROGGSm: enum Foo ( A => 42, 'B', 'C', 'D' ); say +B m: enum Foo ( 'A' => 42, 'B', 'C', 'D' ); say +B m: enum Foo ( 'A' => 42, 'B', 'C', 'D' ); say +A B should either yield 43, or the entire expression should fail to parse. |
From @TimToadyThis also showed up when doing things like: Fixed in d9021cf16e7df051c5e17c33919c9bde44c5e0db but tests needed. On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:37:06 -0800, FROGGS.de wrote:
|
1 similar comment
From @TimToadyThis also showed up when doing things like: Fixed in d9021cf16e7df051c5e17c33919c9bde44c5e0db but tests needed. On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:37:06 -0800, FROGGS.de wrote:
|
From @TimToadyActually, the Z=> misbehavior is already called out in #128017. On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:04:05 -0800, larry wrote:
|
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @zoffixznetTests: Raku/roast@6e6eae6059 |
@zoffixznet - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#130041 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT130041$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: