From @coke

S02-types/baghash.t has a test that creates a BagHash, .grab's some items from it. The final tests in the block are​:

  is $b.total, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';
  is $b.elems, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';

The first test passes, but the second fails - .elems returns 2 - there were 3 elements to start with, and 2 .grabs - looks like the first one is correctly updating .elems, but future ones are not.

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

From @lizmat

On 29 Oct 2013, at 13​:34, Will Coleda (via RT) <perl6-bugs-followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string​: [perl #​120407]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL​: https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=120407 >

S02-types/baghash.t has a test that creates a BagHash, .grab's some items from it. The final tests in the block are​:

is $b.total, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';
is $b.elems, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';

The first test passes, but the second fails - .elems returns 2 - there were 3 elements to start with, and 2 .grabs - looks like the first one is correctly updating .elems, but future ones are not.

Is this on the JVM or on Parrot? I don't see the failure on Parrot.

Liz

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @coke

On Tue Oct 29 07​:01​:58 2013, elizabeth wrote​:

On 29 Oct 2013, at 13​:34, Will Coleda (via RT) <perl6-bugs-
followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string​: [perl #​120407]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL​: https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=120407 >

S02-types/baghash.t has a test that creates a BagHash, .grab's some
items from it. The final tests in the block are​:

is $b.total, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';
is $b.elems, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';

The first test passes, but the second fails - .elems returns 2 -
there were 3 elements to start with, and 2 .grabs - looks like the
first one is correctly updating .elems, but future ones are not.

Is this on the JVM or on Parrot? I don't see the failure on Parrot.

Liz

JVM - Tried to indicate this via the [JVM] in the subject.

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

From @lizmat

On 29 Oct 2013, at 17​:43, Will Coleda via RT <bugs-comment@​bugs6.perl.org> wrote​:

On Tue Oct 29 07​:01​:58 2013, elizabeth wrote​:

On 29 Oct 2013, at 13​:34, Will Coleda (via RT) <perl6-bugs-
followup@​perl.org> wrote​:

# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string​: [perl #​120407]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL​: https://rt-archive.perl.org/perl6/Ticket/Display.html?id=120407 >

S02-types/baghash.t has a test that creates a BagHash, .grab's some
items from it. The final tests in the block are​:

is $b.total, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';
is $b.elems, 0, '.grab *should* change BagHash';

The first test passes, but the second fails - .elems returns 2 -
there were 3 elements to start with, and 2 .grabs - looks like the
first one is correctly updating .elems, but future ones are not.

Is this on the JVM or on Parrot? I don't see the failure on Parrot.

Liz

JVM - Tried to indicate this via the [JVM] in the subject.

Note to self​: pay attention to Subject lines. :-)

Liz

From @usev6

The tests in question are passing again (and they are unfudged). AFAICT the relevant commits to rakudo were​:

* rakudo/rakudo@7ff58f0

* rakudo/rakudo@3687508

I'm closing this ticket.

@usev6 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'