From @masak

<lizmat> r​: say Nil.^mro # is this right ?
<camelia> rakudo 567941​: OUTPUT«Nil (Iterator) (Iterable) (Cool) (Any) (Mu)␤»
<TimToady> Nil is not supposed to be an iterator anymore
<jnthn> TimToady​: Yes, but that can't be fixed without the wider Nil changes.
* masak submits rakudobug
<jnthn> It'll need more than just creating the meta-object
<jnthn> It'll need add_parent'ing.
<lizmat> ah, ok, with that order?
<jnthn> lizmat​: Well, it's a single inheritance chain
<lizmat> ok, will do
<jnthn> So just need to add the immediate parent
<jnthn> And you get the rest by default
<jnthn> Just make sure it comes late enough

From @usev6

As a status update​: Nil is no longer an iterator​:

$ perl6 -e 'say Nil.^mro'
Nil (Cool) (Any) (Mu)

But the recently introduced Empty is​:

$ perl6 -e 'say Empty.^mro'
Empty (Iterator) (Iterable) Nil (Cool) (Any) (Mu)

@usev6 - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @usev6

A status update after the GLR​:

$ perl6 -e 'say Nil.^mro'
(Nil (Cool) (Any) (Mu))

$ perl6 -e 'say Empty.^mro'
((Slip) (List) (Cool) (Any) (Mu))

So neither Nil nor Empty is Iterator anymore.

From @usev6

On Sat Sep 12 01​:35​:43 2015, bartolin@​gmx.de wrote​:

A status update after the GLR​:

$ perl6 -e 'say Nil.^mro'
(Nil (Cool) (Any) (Mu))

$ perl6 -e 'say Empty.^mro'
((Slip) (List) (Cool) (Any) (Mu))

So neither Nil nor Empty is Iterator anymore.

I just saw that there is a (passing) test for this in S02-types/nil.t.

I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.

@usev6 - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'