Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LEAVE phaser doesn't trigger on 'next' in Rakudo #2988

Closed
p6rt opened this issue Dec 5, 2012 · 5 comments
Closed

LEAVE phaser doesn't trigger on 'next' in Rakudo #2988

p6rt opened this issue Dec 5, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

@p6rt
Copy link

p6rt commented Dec 5, 2012

Migrated from rt.perl.org#115998 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT115998$

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Dec 5, 2012

From @masak

<masak> nr​: for 1..10 { LEAVE { say "x" }; next }
<p6eval> niecza v24-5-g599cbcb​: OUTPUT«x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤»
<p6eval> ..rakudo e2f2dc​: ( no output )
* masak submits rakudobug

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Mar 16, 2013

From @jnthn

On Wed Dec 05 02​:44​:42 2012, masak wrote​:

<masak> nr​: for 1..10 { LEAVE { say "x" }; next }
<p6eval> niecza v24-5-g599cbcb​: OUTPUT«x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤»
<p6eval> ..rakudo e2f2dc​: ( no output )
* masak submits rakudobug

Works now​:

for 1..10 { LEAVE { say "x" }; next }
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Mar 16, 2013

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Mar 29, 2013

From @coke

On Sat Mar 16 10​:03​:56 2013, jnthn@​jnthn.net wrote​:

On Wed Dec 05 02​:44​:42 2012, masak wrote​:

<masak> nr​: for 1..10 { LEAVE { say "x" }; next }
<p6eval> niecza v24-5-g599cbcb​: OUTPUT«x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤x␤»
<p6eval> ..rakudo e2f2dc​: ( no output )
* masak submits rakudobug

Works now​:

for 1..10 { LEAVE { say "x" }; next }
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

Tagging testneeded.

/jnthn

Test added in S04-phasers/enter-leave.t

--
Will "Coke" Coleda

@p6rt
Copy link
Author

p6rt commented Mar 29, 2013

@coke - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant