From @japhb

As the subject says, nom segfaults on this​:

  (True but role {}).say

Nobody piped up about having seen it before when I asked at
http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2011-10-10#i_4546609 .

-'f

From @jnthn

On Sun Oct 09 20​:36​:06 2011, gjb@​sonic.net wrote​:

As the subject says, nom segfaults on this​:

\(True but role \{\}\)\.say

Nobody piped up about having seen it before when I asked at
http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2011-10-10#i_4546609 .

Wasn't actually a segfault per se, but rather a C-level stack overflow;
or so says my debugger. Root cause was that we lost the boolification
circularity breaker while doing the mixin. Fixed now​:

(True but role {}).say
Bool​::True

Just needs a test.

/jnthn

The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

From @moritz

Now tested in S14-roles/mixin.t.

@moritz - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'