New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[5.7.0] PERL5OPT messes with build #3433
Comments
@smpeters - Status changed from 'open' to 'stalled' |
From @HugmeirOn Sun Feb 18 01:05:26 2001, Peter@PSDT.com wrote: How? |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'stalled' to 'open' |
From @pjscottOn May 5, 2012, at 4:03 AM, "Brian Fraser via RT" <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
Er, you have me at a disadvantage. Neither my memory nor my mail spool goes back 11 years. I am sure that I thought I was including a body in my message at the time but why there is none now I cannot say. Bit decay, perhaps. I think that it is likely - at least at the time - that setting PERL5OPT affected building perl from source, and that I thought it shouldn't, since it happened to me by accident. Opinions may differ. |
From @tonycozOn Sat, May 05, 2012 at 04:03:17AM -0700, Brian Fraser via RT wrote:
Anything that loads a non in-lib core module? # just an example, Imager isn't suitable for PERL5OPT -M Perhaps there's a less ridiculous option that causes a build failure. Tony |
From @nwc10On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:02:55AM +1000, Tony Cook wrote:
Likely. But your example suggests to me that *mini*perl should ignore all of (Which isn't too hard actually, as ./perl is, or should be, invoked If this idea seems sane, an no-one else beats me to it, I'll try to do it in Nicholas Clark * I should check this :-) |
From @hvdsNicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: I think by "should ignore all of these" you're saying "ignore anything in If so, please consider whether it is worth providing a mechanism to specify I do not have a use for this myself, so I do not request it; but I imagine, Hugo |
From @jkeenanOn Tue May 08 12:02:40 2012, hv wrote:
Nicholas, do you think we should proceed with this? Thank you very much. |
From @LeontOn Mon May 07 17:03:26 2012, tonyc wrote:
Can't this just be solved by adding a «PERL5OPT=» line in the Makefile? Leon |
From @jkeenanOn Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:50:23 GMT, jkeenan wrote:
The discussion in this ticket petered out more than 3 years ago -- and we never had a clear statement of the problem to be solved in the first place. So I recommend closing this ticket (and will do so within 7 days unless someone objects). Thank you very much. -- |
From @jkeenanOn Tue, 27 Dec 2016 22:44:59 GMT, jkeenan wrote:
Closing as per schedule. Thank you very much. -- |
@jkeenan - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#5844 (status was 'rejected')
Searchable as RT5844$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: