New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Obsolete ?PATTERN? still documented #15956
Comments
From @ikegamiCreated by @ikegami?PATTERN? was removed in 5.22, but it's still documented. $ perldoc -o term perlop | grep -P 'PATTERN' $ perl -e'?foo?' Perl Info
|
From @ikegamiperlreref also mentions ?pattern? On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:33:41 -0700, ikegami@adaelis.com wrote:
|
From @demerphqWe still support m?...?, so the docs just need to have the bare ?? form removed. Yves On 20 April 2017 at 05:52, Eric Brine via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
-- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @khwilliamsonThanks for reporting this. Should be now fixed by |
@khwilliamson - Status changed from 'open' to 'pending release' |
From @khwilliamsonThank you for filing this report. You have helped make Perl better. With the release today of Perl 5.26.0, this and 210 other issues have been Perl 5.26.0 may be downloaded via: If you find that the problem persists, feel free to reopen this ticket. |
@khwilliamson - Status changed from 'pending release' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#131176 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT131176$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: