-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 571
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
central documentation of dual-lived modules hard to find #15673
Comments
From @wchristianThis is a bug report for perl from walde.christian@gmail.com, While trying to figure out the answers to questions on a dual-lived module i searched the perl documentation for clues and found that information on their different life cycles is spread all over the core documentation and that their apparent official name differs from the common use name. What follows is a list of sightings of information on them i made. - http://perldoc.perl.org/perlhack.html#Patching-a-core-module I think this could be improved to make it easier for people coming in to find relevant information. Changes i think would be beneficial would be a direct link from the glossary entry to the perlsource entry, as well as adding "Core Module" to the mention of "dual-lived" and its permutations to indicate that dual-lived modules are a subgroup of the core modules. Flags: Site configuration information for perl 5.14.2: Configured by Debian Project at Tue Sep 30 10:36:44 UTC 2014. Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 14 subversion 2) configuration: @INC for perl 5.14.2: Environment for perl 5.14.2: |
From @jkeenanOn Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:33:18 GMT, walde.christian@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be more specific as to "different life cycles" and differences between the "apparent official name" and "common use name" of certain dual-life modules? Which dual-life modules have this name clash?
The Glossary is maintained upstream on CPAN, apparently as part of the 'perlfaq' distribution. So that's where suggestions for revisions specific to the Glossary have to be made.
I ran this regex over blead: ##### I then excluded all finds found in pod/perlNNNNdelta.pod files. That left these finds for review: ##### pod/perlsource.pod pod/perlhack.pod I think the discussion in 'perlsource' is good -- but of course I would think that, because I'm the most recent committer to those paragraphs. ;-) The finds in 'perlpolicy' and 'perlhack' are more tangential. Can you provide specific suggestions for improvements? Thank you very much. |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @jkeenanOn Sat, 19 Nov 2016 23:32:27 GMT, jkeenan wrote:
Christian, any thoughts on this? Thank you very much. |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#129918 (status was 'open')
Searchable as RT129918$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: